I. Introduction
Association of South East Asian Nations is an inter-governmental
organization composed of ten member states from south east Asian region.
ASEAN was founded based on the Bangkok declaration, on 8
august 1967, and on 2007 came to strengthen their position as an international
organization with legal personality, by creating the new constitution or
fundamental law, which is the ASEAN Charter of 2007[1].
This charter aside of being the legal personality of the organization, it also serves
as the fundamental instrument for ASEAN principles and goals, such as the free
trade agreements and ASEAN economic community. On the economic field, ASEAN is
focusing on free flow of goods, services and investments. The idea for the free
flow of investment has actually started since 1987, with the ASEAN Agreement
for the Promotion and Protection of Investments[2].
There are series of instruments for the implementation of free flow of
investment such as the framework agreement on the ASEAN investment area of 1998,
ASEAN comprehensive investment agreement, which, all together, aimed to achieve
the goal of ASEAN Economic Community in 2015[3].
In summary, all the agreements regulate investments and dispute resolution
issues.
In regard to the character of the investment, it has to be
the direct investment with the exception of matters relating to the investments
covered by other ASEAN agreements, such as the ASEAN framework agreement on
services.[4]
The government procurement, the service supplies by a governmental authority of
a member state are also excluded. The international investment protection has a
big challenge on its implementation in ASEAN. In addition, investment area has
a lot of critical point that causes international infestation such as
nationalization, conflict with the property of foreign investors, the flow of
capital and taxation. Beyond that, a 2014 IIA report points that there are two
types of challenges put by states members and faced by investors namely
cancellation and allegation of violation of contracts, revocation or denial of
licenses, which may be the reflection of the National Treatment Principle (NTP)
in regard to the treatment between foreign and national investors. This NTP is
likely to be a contradiction to the non – discrimination standard of GATT
principle. Since
the agreement for the promotion and protection of investment of 1987, this
clause has been stated[5],
although the implementation is various based on the economic capacity of each
member states[6].
II. Body
In regard with the article 9 of
ASEAN Comprehensive agreement on investment, each state member may sign their
reservation. The national treatment standard includes a wide range of items
from the fully prohibited to with restriction principles. Some sector that are
opened to foreign investor, for example, in Brunei Darusalam, the sole
proprietorships and cooperative societies are only given to the citizen of
Brunei; the Lao´s people Democratic Republic is not allowed foreign investor in
sector manufacturing mining and quarrying collection of Guano; the same case
happen in Cambodia, Malaysia, Philippines; and Vietnam are also not allowing
some sector of mining and quarrying, Cambodia prohibits exploration of any kind
of sands for export, while Malaysia on gemstone. The Philippines is only
allowing exploration of mining and service incidental of mining in small-scale
while Vietnam prohibits mining in oil, beside the sector of mining, oil and gas, other sector such as foresty, EEZ
explorations[7]
also mostly close to the foreign investor. Activities and certain sector of
manufacturing, fishery, agriculture, are mostly permitted with restriction in
maximum equity of foreign investment, type of entrepreneur and certain
requirement on registration and other administration license. In addition, in
some members states national treatment is not given to the small and medium
sized entrepreneurs, those member states are Indonesia, Philippines, Brunei Darusalam, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Beside those areas above,
foreign expatriates, privatization, permanent residence and land ownership and
usage also remain subjects of exclusion of the national treatment in some
member states. Foreign expatriate is permitted in Singapore, while in Thailand,
some openness are allowed by national instrument. In Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darusalam, Philippines,
Thailand, Vietnam, concerning any obligation arising from the recognition of
any natural person possessing the right of permanent residence is neither
applying nor claimed upon Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand,
and Vietnam. And regarding the ownership of land is not allowed in Singapore,
Indonesia, Philippines, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, although it is possible to
lease of land with limited and some requirement.
III. Conclusion
National treatment raises some of the most
significant issues in the field of foreign direct investment. It stipulates
formal equality between foreign and national investor. However, in practice
national investor, especially those that could be identified as infant industries
or infant entrepreneur, may be in an economically disadvantageous position by
comparison with foreign investor, who may be economically powerful
transactional corporations. Such economic asymmetry may require a degree of
flexibility in the treatment of national investor, especially in developing
countries, for instance through the granting of exception to national treatment
and it is the fact that national treatment has not been implemented hundred per
cent in ASEAN member states due to economic development of each member state, nevertheless it is important to underline that
ASEAN keeps moving forward to realize free flow investment, and to achieve the
goal of national treatment is not easy, this also stated in executive summary
of United nations conference on trade agreement and development UNCTAD in1999 “the
national treatment standard is perhaps the single most important standard of
treatment enshrined in international investment agreement (IIAs). At the same
time, it is perhaps the most difficult standard to achieve, as it touches upon
economically (and politically) sensitive issues. In fact, no single country has
so far seen itself in a position to grant national treatment without
qualifications, especially when it comes to the establishment of an investment”.
[2] this agreement was signed by five founding fathers of
ASEAN and Brunei Darusalam, the first member who joined ASEAN on 7 january 1984
[3] article 1 of ASEAN comprehensive Investment agreement,
Thailand, 26 February 2009. Stated that the objective of this agreement is to
create a free and open investment regime in ASEAN in order to achieve the end
goal of economic integration under the Asean Economic Comunity in accordance
with the AEC blueprint. Through the following;
a. progressive
liberalisation of the investment regime of member states
b. provision of
enhanced protection to investors of all member stats and their investment
c. improvement of
transparency and predictability of investment rules, regulations and procedures
conducive to increased investment among member states
d. join promotion of
the region as an integrated investment área
e. cooperation to
create favourable condition for investement by investor of a member state in
the territory of the other member states
[5] According to article 7.